Posted on February 9, 2008 by tekanji
Short answer: No, what is commonly called “female privilege” is better described as benevolent sexism. Systems like the draft and chivalry often seem advantageous to women at first glance, but when examined more closely they in fact reinforce sexist institutions that keep both women and men from true equality. Also, it should be noted that, [...]
Filed under: FAQ, FWW, clarifying-concepts, privilege, sexism | 22 Comments »
Posted on February 8, 2008 by tigtog
A: No. This is an often repeated claim based on either faulty understanding or outright misrepresentation of a few studies made using the CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE (CTS) or similar self-report surveys. One of the authors of the original study, Richard Gelles, categorically rejects this interpretation of his research, and has done ever since these [...]
Filed under: FWW, Family & Work, clarifying-concepts, gender, oppression, violence | Tagged: battered-men, battered-women, battering, conflict-tactics-scale, domestic-violence, factoids, violence, violence-against-women | 20 Comments »
Posted on February 1, 2008 by tekanji
Chances are, whether or not you identify as feminist, if you’ve read much about women’s issues you’ll have heard of the Male Privilege Checklist. You also may have heard of at least one of the various Female Privilege Checklists that were made in response. I’m not here to rebut either of those lists word for [...]
Filed under: Addressing claims of female privilege, FWW, Feminism Friday, masculinity, privilege, spot the strawfeminist | 62 Comments »
Posted on January 22, 2008 by tigtog
A: No, what it means is that some prosecutors in the past proceeded to court solely on the basis of identifications without corroborating physical evidence, mostly in cases of stranger-rape, and that they convinced the juries in those cases that the identification was valid, when later evidence shows that the identification was mistaken. New [...]
Filed under: FAQ, FWW, clarifying-concepts, violence | Tagged: acquaintance-rape, date-rape, DNA, DNA-exonerations, false allegations, mistaken identification, rape, sexual-assault, stranger-rape, uncorroborated | 13 Comments »
Posted on January 10, 2008 by tigtog
I have been distracted over the holiday break, and this has meant that over the last month or so I have allowed some commenters through whom I would normally have cut off at the pass. The tone of the blog has suffered badly as a result. Those commentors are aggressive and are discouraging [...]
Filed under: FF101-admin, FWW, Social Justice, announcements, netiquette | Tagged: comments policy, constructive debate, disemvowel, disruptive commentors, feminisms, moderation | 5 Comments »
Posted on October 18, 2007 by tekanji
Short answer: Nothing in and of itself. The problem occurs when conversations about women can’t happen on unmoderated blogs without someone showing up and saying, “but [x] happens to men, too!” (also known as a “Patriarchy Hurts Men, Too” or PHMT argument, or a “What About The Mens?” or WATM argument). When this happens, it [...]
Filed under: FAQ, FWW, clarifying-concepts, masculinity, netiquette, privilege | 81 Comments »
Posted on June 23, 2007 by tigtog
Rational people often assume that some opinions and judgements are so obviously part of their worldview that they really don’t need to be said. Unfortunately, some maliciously disruptive people take delight in assuming that if something has not been clearly stated then they are safe in assuming the worst of others, even when such assumptions [...]
Filed under: FWW, Feminism Friday, clarifying-concepts, spot the strawfeminist | Tagged: clarifying-concepts, cruelty, denunciations, exploitation, Feminism Friday, FGM, FWW, harm, hivemind, misrepresentation, oppression, strawfeminist | 20 Comments »