Posted on February 9, 2008 by tekanji
Short answer: No, what is commonly called “female privilege” is better described as benevolent sexism. Systems like the draft and chivalry often seem advantageous to women at first glance, but when examined more closely they in fact reinforce sexist institutions that keep both women and men from true equality. Also, it should be noted that, [...]
Filed under: FAQ, FWW, clarifying-concepts, privilege, sexism | 22 Comments »
Posted on February 8, 2008 by tigtog
A: No. This is an often repeated claim based on either faulty understanding or outright misrepresentation of a few studies made using the CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE (CTS) or similar self-report surveys. One of the authors of the original study, Richard Gelles, categorically rejects this interpretation of his research, and has done ever since these [...]
Filed under: FWW, Family & Work, clarifying-concepts, gender, oppression, violence | Tagged: battered-men, battered-women, battering, conflict-tactics-scale, domestic-violence, factoids, violence, violence-against-women | 20 Comments »
Posted on January 22, 2008 by tigtog
A: No, what it means is that some prosecutors in the past proceeded to court solely on the basis of identifications without corroborating physical evidence, mostly in cases of stranger-rape, and that they convinced the juries in those cases that the identification was valid, when later evidence shows that the identification was mistaken. New [...]
Filed under: FAQ, FWW, clarifying-concepts, violence | Tagged: acquaintance-rape, date-rape, DNA, DNA-exonerations, false allegations, mistaken identification, rape, sexual-assault, stranger-rape, uncorroborated | 13 Comments »
Posted on January 22, 2008 by tigtog
A few links to posts addressing particular points of feminist theory and activism, tied together by the fact that they included memorable soundbite rebuttals:
Jill (Feministe):
Deni’s argument is that prostitutes can’t be raped because they sell sex — which is kind of like saying that merchants can’t be robbed because they sell goods.
Richie (Crimitism) on women’s [...]
Filed under: clarifying-concepts, feminism, recommendations | Tagged: fat, prostitution, rape, semi-starvation, sexual-assault, victimisation | No Comments »
Posted on December 7, 2007 by tigtog
Shorter Pamela Bone: feminists are such cowardly hypocrites for being against FGM and rape in war whenever any culture does it instead of just specially castigating Islamic societies where such brutalities occur.
I posted over at Hoyden About Town a few days ago with more background to Bone’s article about how she bravely spoiled a literary [...]
Filed under: Feminism Friday, clarifying-concepts, op-ed, oppression, spot the strawfeminist | Tagged: Burkina Faso, Congo, Darfur, Egypt, Feminism Friday, FGM, Germaine Greer, Islam, Rwanda, strawfeminist | 3 Comments »
Posted on November 12, 2007 by tigtog
A rather interesting discussion is developing in the comments to “Ask A Question“, but it’s becoming more and more off-topic, and I’m also concerned that it is inappropriate for the discussion to be in that thread with no PTSD trigger warnings, so I’m going to shift all the comments here and delete their text there [...]
Filed under: clarifying-concepts, masculinity, reproductive justice, violence | 44 Comments »
Posted on November 9, 2007 by tigtog
Last week’s Feminism Friday post was on why Rape Jokes Just Aren’t Funny, based on a series from Melissa McEwan of Shakesville, and at the crosspost on Hoyden About Town Bernice made a telling comment.
Humour - the final frontier of colonialisation. You really now you’ve co-opted someone into the frame of dominance from which [...]
Filed under: Feminism Friday, clarifying-concepts, no-sense-of-humour, objectification, privilege, sexism | Tagged: Feminism Friday, humour, no-sense-of-humour, objectification, privilege, sexism | 6 Comments »